Pages

Showing posts with label DIY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DIY. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Scott Cooley: The Raygun of Singer-Songwriters?

New year, same thoughts about my situation as a “worldwide” recording artist.  How to reach a larger audience when I’m not a “hey, look at me!” type of person.  Getting noticed and discovered and recommended by more people is what we want.  There are a lot of us with this predicament.  I don’t play live, don’t have a manager, promoter, or a record company staff doing any marketing for me or otherwise helping me get attention online or in publications or whatever.  And I can’t bring myself to seek out such opportunities or do any of that type of work in my free time.  I’m not a hustler, I’m a creator.  I am always self-deprecating, and I balance the desire to create new music and share it with the world with wondering if the music business is telling me the streams just aren’t there to justify continuing.  Should I drop myself from my own label?  One problem is I can't afford any marketing, but another is I sort of despise self-promotion.  What else could I be doing?  Some say the cream rises to the top naturally, and since I'm still a bottom-dweller after 20+ years, maybe I need to get a clue and either get better or get out.  Better songs is one thing to focus on in the new year, which I certainly have control over, but I’m ruling out better recording quality and better performance quality by not being able to afford pro engineers and session musicians that pro studios (whether brick/mortar or cloud service) could provide.  I honestly believe some of my songs are worthy and deserving of the pro treatment, and I know that forking out over two grand for a premium Martin guitar about 15 years ago that I didn’t think I was good enough to deserve, did indeed turn out to be worth it for my favorite hobby.  Should I invest more in myself and take it more seriously, or should I be ashamed that I’ve taken it as seriously as I already have been for all these years?  Such are my thoughts as I begin a new year, and I know I’m not alone.  


It takes great patience and the right frame of mind to read my long-winded posts that help me figure these things out, and yet I know from my analytics that quite a few of you do, so I’ll type on.


The underground music scene, which has been increasingly marginalized on streaming platforms by power-hungry and control-hungry major record labels under the guise of their "artist-centric" rhetoric, is as strong and fresh as it has ever been.  Self-releasing independent DIY lo-fi artists like me seem to thrive on platforms like Bandcamp.  Such music sounds very real/genuine/authentic/etc. compared to the trend-chasing, digitally-polished and artificially-perfect fake-sounding music the major labels release.  Unlike the signed artists who are expected to sound perfectly fake and market the heck out of themselves on social media and elsewhere, artists like me have no expectations (or budget) for such nonsensical pursuits.  Most of us don't really seek publicity, don't buy fake streams, and don't buy fake playlist adds.  We love being totally independent so we can focus on the important stuff like writing good songs without any expectation of recouping recording or marketing loans.  We don't stoop low enough to drum up controversy or “sensationalization” for attention.


Music Marketing for “Emerging” or “Aspiring” or “Developing” Artists

All that being swept aside, it is necessary to market yourself as an artist, and to do that, you must first have some understanding of what genre of music you make, what other artists you sound like, and who your audience is.  If you are not able to describe it, categorize it, explain your style, etc., then it's a tough row to hoe.  The major labels / streaming platforms are now ramping up their gatekeeping so that if you don't get a certain number of streams for each song (1,000 per year each to be more precise), you stand no chance of getting paid.  This allows them to make more money, and that's why they exist.  For a couple of decades now, however, due to it becoming increasingly inexpensive to buy simple home recording equipment and pay for aggregator digital distribution services, they claim something needs to be done about the "oversaturation" of music that simply isn't popular enough.  When the fans decide what they like best, as opposed to what the major labels decide to market to them, it is theoretically better for everyone, but with so much competition, you can't get over a thousand streams per year of each song you release, year after year, without scrambling to get online attention somehow.


Past Mid-Career Already, Yet Not Easy To Market

I have more than two decades and twelve albums under my belt, so I must have a story capable of capturing attention if I want to take things to a higher level of public awareness, right?  If I only knew how to describe myself as a musical artist, I might then be able to formulate a marketing strategy, plan and execute a publicity campaign of some kind.  I guess that would mean reaching out to music bloggers and ask them to write about me, or paying for actual advertising to get that fan base past the streaming threshold.  As a non-performing solo artist seeking a larger audience online, I suppose doing a lot of frequent social media posts might help, as would getting the music reviewed or being interviewed.  Before thinking about what my “brand” is, or how to make my story more interesting, I need to at least be willing to seek attention, and it goes against my grain, but I think about it from time to time.  The fact is that platforms like Bandcamp are full of really interesting artists who you would never imagine being appropriate to be promoted for radio airplay, but nonetheless are so much fun to discover and listen to.  So, although I’m not an attention-seeking personality type, I give it some thought.


A New Approach – Maybe Brutal Honesty Would Work?

Last year, someone asked me what kind of a solo artist I am.  Once again, as always, I struggled to provide a quick, easy answer for such a question.  My music does not fit neatly into a popular genre people are familiar with.  I wish there was a simple way to explain it, but I have trouble with it.  People really want a categorization or at least some sort of explanation, and they find it hard to believe I can't describe myself to them.  The right thing to do is to have a short answer that makes them want to listen to decide for themselves.  It should include who you get compared to.  I remain unprepared, and wish I could be ready with the perfect elevator pitch answer.  Sometimes I say something like “you know how there’s people who aren’t very good who just release their music on the streaming platforms anyway?  I’m one of them.”  They usually don’t understand, because they only listen to their favorite famous artists anyway.


Looney Tunes

It seriously took a lot out of me to even tell people about my last album “Sunrise” when I released it last June.  Social media makes people get crazy, so I generally like to avoid it.  I got a little Looney Tunes near the end of 2024, what with the holiday stress and all here where I live near Goodrich, Michigan, home of the Martians, and like Marvin the Martian, there were a few times when I wanted to shoot a ray gun at my music “career” and make it go away, find a different hobby, but then I came back to my senses.



Also last year, I finally thought of another self-deprecating way to describe myself:  

I'm the Raygun of solo artists, the Rachael Gunn of music streaming.  

Translation:  So bad I make people laugh hysterically.


Becoming Aware of Raygun, the Dr. of Breakin', the OG Australian B-Girl

Let me explain.  Somehow, last year I was made aware of a video on YouTube showing a losing performance by this Raygun person in the summer Olympics breakdancing competition.  First of all, I didn't even know breakdancing was technically a sport, let alone an Olympic sport, but apparently, it is now.  That, by itself, was hilarious to me.  Also, the name Raygun sounded hilarious, especially after seeing what she looked like, but I did initially think it could be a good breaker's name.  Then before clicking the link to play the video, I expected it to look like the breakdancing I'd seen on TV or in those bad movies of the 1980s when it was new.  It didn't.  I expected a black person in 80s style urban street attire.  Instead, it was a white Australian woman wearing what looked like a uniform of track pants and a baseball hat.  Her moves didn't look like the breakdancing I'd seen before, and I started thinking to myself as I watched it that maybe it had evolved a lot since I'd seen it back in the day.  Trying to keep an open mind, I found myself laughing out loud a little bit as I watched it.  I wasn't sure what I'd just seen, and thought it was not out of the realm of possibility that it was a joke of some kind.


Then I decided to google her, and learned that a lot of other people had the same reaction.  Unsurprisingly, she got a score of zero, meaning no points awarded by judges at all.  People shared theories online that she had somehow scammed the system to get into the competition so that she could use her Olympics experience as a free vacation while representing her country and getting them to foot the bill.  Further research revealed this was not the case at all, and she took the "sport" so seriously that she actually had a PhD degree in breakdancing.  The world changed a lot since Krush Groove and Breakin 2 Electric Boogaloo, when no one could have ever fathomed that it would not only become an Olympic sport, but something you could get a doctorate degree in.  Obviously, she took it very seriously, was trying hard to be creative with her own style, flair, technique, and choreography, and wanted to win.  Then I learned that she had some legitimate qualifications at the national level, which made me think break dancing must have evolved to something way different in Australia.  Even more funny are the online comments on the video footage of her.  People have named her various moves and created memes.  Lastly, I was sad to learn she was not able to laugh along with others' reactions and instead felt so bad about the cyberbullying that she quit.



Not Like Raygun in Some Ways

Fortunately, I have not experienced any bullying about my music career.  Unlike Raygun, I don't have any formal music education at all.  I'm completely self taught.  Also unlike Raygun, I am able to make fun of myself and maintain a sense of humor about trying to go for it in the music business.  If songwriting became an Olympic sport, there'd be a ton of Americans who would qualify before me.  I'm cracking myself up as I type this.


Zero Scores, Zero Streams

But like Raygun's zero scores, I have written, recorded and released many songs that have zero plays on some some streaming platforms.  No points scored at all.  One could argue it's due to a lack of any marketing whatsoever on my part, and although there is truth in that, I can admit, those songs are not my best.  I am a terrible singer and weak guitar player and even worse at the other instruments and recording and production and all that other stuff I attempt.  


Similar Reactions?

I know people must have a similar reaction when they do stream my music.  They must think to themselves, "okay, what's this?"...and then after hitting play on a couple more, they must think to themselves "why is this guy even on Spotify in the first place?"  Things along those lines, I imagine.  So, that's how I'm like Raygun.  The Raygun of singer-songwriters who makes people wonder "how did he get here?" or "why is this even allowed?"


No Joke

Also, like Raygun, my art is not a joke.  I seriously love writing songs and recording them, and actually think many of them are pretty damned good songs.  I'm serious about the passion I have for the craft.  I'm still laughing as I type this, realizing how it must sound to those who have heard the quality of my recordings (or lack thereof).  On the one hand, I don't take it that seriously, and I think of it as a fun hobby.  I don't work very hard on it at all – a fact that should be evident to all who listen.  On the other hand, I'm enthusiastic about it as a creative outlet in my life.  Some of my songs are intentionally humorous, almost like novelty songs, but not quite.  I know many must laugh at the ones I didn't intend to be funny too.  I can laugh along with them.  Some of my acoustic guitar solos are the music equivalent of Raygun’s Kangaroo pose.  I know I'm not awesome, but I do have some ill moves in my arsenal.  😊  I’d put my shredding technique up there with former 80s child actor Corey Feldman – another person who went viral last year.


Sneaking In and the Inevitable Increased Gatekeeping

Raygun sort of snuck in when the sport was new, and they may not let in others like her in future competitions.  The powers that be might get a little stricter with their gatekeeping.  Similarly, I sort of snuck in to the music business when they started allowing self-releasing DIY independent artists like me about twenty years ago now.  In the last couple years, the music business has been getting more stringent with their gatekeeping so there will be fewer like me allowed into the music streaming services in the future.


I haven't given up yet, and the “artist-centric” greedy major record labels and music streaming service gatekeepers haven't totally shut me out yet, so I'm going to keep going for it and releasing new music.  A lot of people don't realize it's dirt-cheap to put out an album these days yourself without needing to be signed to a record label deal.  So, they’re surprised when they learn my music is available alongside the greats of the industry.  


The Eye of the Beholder Thing

Streams happen, or don't.  Stats happen.  Judgement is going to happen.  Beauty in any creation is different for each individual person who experiences it.  Opinions about the value and merit of different types of art, including breakdancing or music, are personal.  Emotional reactions are subjective, appreciation depends on people's tastes.  You be the judge.  I don't seek outside opinions about my music at all.  Just my wife and a couple friends.  I'm not competitive in any way.  No one ever reviews my music.  I'm in a bubble, yes, but I don't have a skewed perception of reality.  I'm fairly certain more than one person in the world has thought I was embarrassing myself by releasing music, or that I should be embarrassed about doing it.  I am a little embarrassed, for some of the songs, but I keep trying, and I actually notice little ways I might be getting better over the years.  Maybe not at all though, come to think of it, and at least I can laugh about that.


No Guts No Glory

I am someone who has had the courage to be vulnerable and offer up my creativity for judgement by releasing my music on a worldwide stage, just like Raygun.  She and I each had the guts to give it a try, thinking it was worthy and that some people would like it.  We were right.  It's not so much that we had confidence despite lacking talent.  I'm not ultra-confident, but I just do it anyway.  I am afraid to have people hear my music, but at the same time, I want it to be available because I know some people will like it.  I'm not delusional.


Raygun has stated that she is only going to dance for personal enjoyment for the rest of her life.  I think it would be better if she came back strong in Los Angeles in 2028.  It would also be great if she could learn to laugh at herself, laugh along with people laughing at her.  I have respect for her.  For real.  I also can’t help but laugh – both at her routine and the world’s reaction to her.


The Inevitable Humble-Bragging

At least Raygun can say she competed in an Olympic sport.  Whatever level of accomplishment anyone has in anything, there are some who are better and some who are worse off.  You need the people who fail.  Someone has to lose.  I make other solo artists look good, and solo artists like me must exist if you think about it in a certain way.  We can’t all be tied.  This is ridiculous because writing songs is not a sport, but if it were, at least I’d be able to say I got a certain number of streams, and that number would be higher than some other artists.


I really do like to think of myself as a modest person, and yet, I like to occasionally humble-blog about myself.  It’s the equivalent of the nauseating holiday letters that boast accomplishments you get along with Christmas cards from large wealthy successful families you sort of envy/hate/make fun of.  But it’s also a form of me, the Raygun of solo artists, engaging with you, my superfans, which “they” say is extremely important.


I was fortunate last year that a really good singer and solo artist named Ultimate Rick Jones recorded and released an outstanding professional and commercial-sounding cover version of one of my songs, “Used To Be Good Looking.”  He was one of the few out there in the world to recognize it was a good song, which admittedly wasn’t easy to spot from hearing my own version, but if you listen to his, you might start thinking I am not a terrible songwriter, at least.  


This gave me some additional confidence, but I'm definitely not overconfident.  This blog is full of posts where I basically admit I know I'm not great, but the stats don't lie.  Last I checked, my not quitting has resulted in my song "Mackinac Island" (admittedly a novelty song) racking up over 26,000 streams on Spotify alone.  


Not to brag, but I might be laughing all the way to a whole penny someday soon.  But yeah, in some ways, as Raygun is to breakdancing, Scott Cooley is to music making.  We’re both out to express ourselves creatively and entertain.  


Happy New Year!  As always, I’ll be working on the next batch of tunes for you, as free time allows, while wisely not giving up the day job, and will be planning another release, possibly even later this year.  Also as always, I’ll be blogging about myself as I continue to pretend I’m a solo artist.  It’s a little insane, I know, but people need hobbies.


Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Home Recording The Scott Cooley Way - My Method in 2024

Things.  I basically do two things:  1)  write songs;  and 2)  record them.  Well, I also 3)  release them publicly.  If anything at all, it's the third thing that makes the content of this blog potentially interesting.  If I just wrote and recorded songs that no one ever heard, it wouldn't make as much sense to write about doing those things.  It was more interesting earlier in my "career" because I was among the first wave of DIY artists to release home-recorded CDs on Amazon and downloads on iTunes back in the days when such things first became possible.  Now, of course, everyone and their brother has things like a computer, a microphone, an audio interface, and a little money to distribute through an aggregator to the streaming services without the need for a record label contract.  Since my last public release of music in 2022, as has been the case for over 20 years now, I've continued to write and record.

I'm getting ready to release another album soon.  The target "drop" date is June 21st - my birthday - as usual, and I'll probably include 13 songs, again as usual.  Every two years I weed out about half the songs I write, record the rest, and I typically record a song in about an hour.  So it's not like it takes me a ton of time to record an album - it could be done in a couple days, but I spread it out as free time allows.  I usually average writing about one song per month, but they come in spurts.

I generally write a song and then record a first take on my phone's audio recorder app with just my voice and acoustic guitar.  Then if after listening back to those first takes I like them, I record them on my computer and add additional parts.

The phone recorder app is easily scrollable and shows the record dates organized by month.  Looking back at my writing/recording productivity since the last album released in June 2022, here's how it broke down:

  • Jul. 2022:  Wrote two, only recorded one of them
  • Aug. 2022:  Wrote two, recorded both
  • Oct. 2022:  Wrote one, recorded it
  • Apr. 2023:  Wrote six, recorded all of them
  • Aug. 2023:  Wrote two, recorded both
  • Oct. 2023:  Wrote two, recorded both

So, this time around, I only weeded out one, and that gave me 12 songs recorded since the last album, within the last two years, but I haven't written any since October of last year.  I have several recorded that were previously weeded out, so I'll be choosing one of them to include...unless I write & record more between now and June.

Evidently, there was no activity in Sept. 2022, then a huge gap of 5 months time between Nov. 2022 to March 2023 with no activity, then another 3 month gap in May/June/July of 2023, another no activity month in September 2023, then nothing in about the last 6 months.

I don't know why I wait 2 years between albums, and I don't know why I choose 13 as the number of songs on my albums, but as you can see, it just sort of works out that way.

I usually have way more to choose from in a 2-year span of time, so I'm a little nervous about that. Also, I usually weed out way more of my first takes on the phone, and never record digital multitrack versions of them.  You might think the song quality will suffer as a result, but one never knows.  I like to keep a low bar for myself, yet it feels like my hurdles have been higher this time around the track.

The writing may take only a few minutes per song, but sometimes I'll recycle old scraps of lyrics, and sometimes I'll sit on musical ideas for a while, so there can be a long span until finalized.  Then I really do crank out the recording part fast once I have a finalized song ready to go.  Obviously, I'm not a perfectionist.  I just like to keep things fresh, get each song recorded close to how I imagine it sounding, get 'er done, then move on to the next.

How do I record my songs so quickly?  How do I get the sound I get when recording in my little home "studio"?  What order do I do things in when recording?  What equipment and software do I use?

The short answer is I have a desk in a spare bedroom now in my house, and on it is a computer, a small midi keyboard, and a small audio interface that allows for software insert effects.  On a shelf above it are two small speakers, a single microphone and a printer.  Next to my desk is an acoustic guitar.  That's it.  I use software for everything else.  Pretty simple and low footprint.

Most people wouldn't want the Scott Cooley sound, but people have asked me how I do it over the years.  I am completely self-taught.  How you record can be thought of by some people as almost being like a proprietary trade secret.

I don't mind sharing my approach, but the overall sound I get is probably well below the level of quality anyone else would want to strive for.  Also, it's important to note that my approach has evolved over the years, and there are always variations depending on the song.

As a home recording person who does everything alone with zero training, I've just figured out through trial and error what works for me.  That, and reading the user guide and/or online help that comes with the DAW software.  I've googled how to do things, watched a couple youtube how-to videos, and learned from a few online forums too.

If curious at all, you might like to know this abbreviated sequential list of steps that I usually follow:

  1. turn on the metronome in the DAW and set it to desired click tempo
  2. while listening to that in one headphone with the other off my ear, record the rhythm guitar track into a microphone clean, angled from neck to soundhole about 6 inches away
  3. record a scratch vocal track into a mic, clean, while listening to the rhythm track with one earphone off, so I can hear my own voice too
  4. record bass track, used to always do a mic'd acoustic, but sometimes a direct electric bass, and more recently, just play a MIDI keyboard, tried a mic'd amp w/ electric, but never got good results, and the DI electric into audio 1/4 input can have bass eq/comp and/or bass amp sim plugin with mixed results, the keyboard way offers the best sonic quality so far, but this one is always a challenge to get a good sound
  5. record kick, then snare, then toms, then hat, then crash each separately, all with midi keyboard and virtual sounds, used to mic a djembe and use a nylon brush on a snare various mics, but virtual on keys is my preferred method now
  6. record percussion - tambourine, shaker, etc. into mic if desired, also mic'd congas/bongos if desired, or cowbell ocasionally (never enough)
  7. mix the drums, muting other tracks, adjusting volume and pan for each, doing the kick centered, each of other panned wider as desired
  8. mix the bass volume to fit in with the drums, panned center
  9. mix the rhythm guitar to fit with the bass while muting rest
  10. record backing vocals, usually 2 takes, then pan L & R
  11. record lead vocal, with large diaphram condenser, usually takes many tries, then I pick the best, I've comped before, but prefer do-overs until I get it as good as I can all the way through in one take
  12. record lead acoustic guitar into mic, doing intros, fills, instrumental break solos, outros, etc. as desired
  13. apply effects processing to each track, and by this I usually mean EQ, but sometimes a little compression, and sometimes reverb.  I have presets and saved scripts for a lot of these, and I usually leave the bass and kick pretty clean.
  14. mix down to stereo wav, listen on speakers, car speakers, etc, take notes, then return to make volume/pan adjustments (pre-mastering)
  15. master the wave with some overall eq/compression - again, I have some saved scripts I run for these
  16. done!

That's generally "how" I do it, but here's "what I use" to do it with:

I used to do all of the above in Adobe Audition v.3.1, then I tried Cakewalk for a while for just the recording part only because it was free and supported the new MIDI keyboard I purchased, and now I use Logic for just the recording part and some of the effects, then bounce and export/import into Adobe Audition for the mixing and mastering still.  I still love Adobe Audition because it has outstanding noise reduction features that just don't exist in other DAWs, and these are necessary when recording everything into microphones from real instruments, and the mastering tools are also on par with out-of-box Logic or even Ozone, which I've also experimented with.

I've purchased and experimented with about 5 or 6 different microphones over the years - dynamics, condensers small and large, but have now replaced them all with a Townsend which has simulation settings to make it sound like any mic, and integrates well with my Universal Audio Apollo interface and Logic.

I've purchased and experimented with about 4 different audio interfaces over the years - a Roland, a Focusrite, a Tascam, but now replaced them all with a UA Apollo Twin lightning bolt.

For years, I used a Dell running Windows 7, and still use it for mastering with the Adobe Audition, but now I use an iMac with Logic for the recording steps.

I've had two MIDI keyboards, but the one I use now is a Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol because it integrates really well with Logic.  It's the smallest one they make, and has software that lets you play a piano or organ chord with a single key, and also to make the keys sound like drums, bass, etc.

The Mac/Logic/Townsend/Apollo/Komplete is the ultimate setup for me, it all plays well with each other and makes things efficient and easy.  If Logic had good noise reduction, it might replace the need for Adobe Audition, but I also have all these batch scripts that run customized effects processing sequences I created in there, so that's a big time-saver.  Spent hours of my life A/B testing them all 'till I found combinations I liked, so I keep the AA for now until my old Dell dies on me, then I'll have to consider other options.  There are so many options in Logic I've never even tried, so might experiment in there further someday, but I like my process the way it is for now.

I have a Fender Jazz bass, which I love playing but hardly ever use anymore for recording, and a bass amp that is totally unnecessary, and a Martin HD-28 acoustic that is too bassy/boomy, but still great.  I have a Takamine non-upright acoustic bass guitar, but hardly ever use it anymore.  I have several electric guitars, a multi-effects pedal board, and an amp.  Similar to the various ways to record electric bass, I never seem to get a good electric sound no matter what I try, and I just prefer the sound of an acoustic.  However, it's fun to crank it up to 11 sometimes and jam.  I have the percussion stuff, the bongos, a set of Hohner special 20 harmonicas, a ukulele, and a hawaiian weissenborn for acoustic slide playing, and still have the old snare drum, the djembe, and cymbal I used to use.  Small JBL monitors and Sony MD headphones.  Oh yeah, I've got my wife's marimba I record with quite a lot too.  I've borrowed my friend's mandolin a couple times, but just can't get into it due to fat fingers.

Now, I've evolved to not needing much to get the sound I get.  I pretty much do songs with the full (acoustic) rock band treatment with only my voice, my Martin acoustic, and my keyboard for the bass, drums, piano, etc., so almost all in-the-box now.  All the other crap is in the basement storage now, awaiting my death after which my nephew will likely take it all to his basement and possibly use and/or sell some of it.

As you can hear with my studio recordings, I don't use many effects at all, just some EQ on most tracks a little reverb on the vocal.  I like to keep it clean, real and acoustic sounding, even though I've embraced virtual instruments.  No racks of hardware, no preamps, nothing like that.  It's all done in the software.  Everyone says I should use a preamp, but the ability to do "on the way in" insert effects on my Apollo interface combined with the virtual microphone simulation and insert channel strip effects on my Townsend mic negate the need for one.

Where the magic happens:  My dusty home studio 

You can see earlier incarnations of it here:  https://www.scottcooley.com/studio.  I don't like a cluttered room.  No room treatment either.  I do also have one of those acoustic foam things behind my microphone, but I don't know that it makes any difference or not. I don't really have any desire to add any equipment or software for recording.  As long as nothing breaks, I have everything I need and want already.  Took a long time to arrive here, a lot of trying out different things to see how they sound, a lot of mistake making and learning, and quite a bit of money.

Future Plans Beyond This Year:  My next thing will be to try to get a good electric guitar sound with software only and just directly plugging it into the audio interface.  I'm not much of a fingerstyle player, and realize the types of songs I write would probably lend themselves well to being electric guitar rock songs instead of acoustic.  Also, I can now appreciate the value in releasing singles - so I might try the staggered release of one song at a time approach in the future.  For the few fans out there who enjoy my music, and crave hearing more, they wouldn't have to wait as long to get their fix.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

The Experiment Explained – Confessions of a “True” Indie Music DIY’er


Can a non-performing recording artist sell music online without anyone’s help?  This is the big question that I’m working on finding an answer for.  It’s an experiment at this point.  I’m trying to see if it’s possible.  I wonder if I’m the only one like me out there!  Could it be that I’m the only digital solo recording artist attempting this?  What is it exactly that I do myself, you might wonder?  I’m an independent recording artist who has released several albums & singles (both CDs and MP3s) for sale in major online stores like Amazon and iTunes.  I know I have lots of company in this regard.  

However, I wonder if there’s anyone else out there who single-handedly does all of these related things:
  • Writing the words and music for the songs
  • Publishing the songs
  • Singing the songs
  • Playing all the instruments – guitar, bass, drums, etc.
  • Recording the songs
  • Producing the songs
  • Mixing the songs
  • Mastering the songs and albums
  • Packaging the albums (including all artwork)
  • Delivering the music
  • Advertising, marketing, promotion, pitching, press, publicity, etc.
  • Web site design, authoring, content, publishing & maintenance
  • Social networking, mailing list communications

I do these all totally alone, by myself, without any help from anyone.  A few caveats are in order before I go on:  I pay for a distribution service to get the songs into the online stores;  my lovely wife Lenore has taken an album cover photo, has played accordion and marimba on a couple songs, and has provided background vocals on a couple songs.  Another is that I don't claim to be particularly good at any of them yet, and am better at some more than others.  They say creative types aren't good at the business aspect of music, and so far that is true for me, but I'm trying.

Most indie solo artists I know typically get a lot of help with many of the above.   Bands obviously have an inherent separation of duties.  For the solo acts though, quite often they play a single instrument themselves – usually a guitar, and usually they sing the vocals, and write some of the songs, but that's about it.  

They are prone to getting help in the following ways:
  • They are signed to an independent record label
  • Co-writers write either the music or words or portions of both
  • They pay a company to have their songs published and promoted
  • They hire background vocalists
  • They hire studio musicians to play the other instrument tracks
  • They book studio time for use of recording facilities and equipment
  • They pay for a producer
  • They pay for a recording engineer
  • They pay for a mastering service
  • They pay a professional photographer
  • They pay a graphic artist to design album art
  • They hire a duplication service to burn & package CDs
  • They pay for a web host, web site design service & webmaster
  • They hire someone to manage their social online presence
  • They pay someone to handle press, promotions, PR, marketing, etc.

The list above is just for a recording artist, and doesn’t even get into live performance-related stuff like booking agency, merchandising or tour management.  It almost goes without saying that touring acts have less time for all of the above activities.  Similarly, however, in my case I have a full-time day job, which at least cancels out the fact that I’m not a live performer in this regard.  I'm proud of my accomplishments as a recording artist so far, and it occurs to me that it might be rare that someone is able to figure out this many different aspects with limited free time.

You have to spend money to make money, they say.  So far my modest investment includes:
  • Guitar, bass, drums
  • Audio interface, headphones
  • Computer, recording software
  • Domain name registration
  • Music distribution service

Everything else I’ve literally done for free, and I've taught myself all of it with only the occasional assistance of free information I've found on the web.  The domain name registration (a nominal cost) and music store distribution service are ongoing annual expenses, while the instruments and recording equipment are paid for – they were far from premium-level, by the way.  The paid-for stuff I wanted anyway, so that was worth it.  Overall, I’ve spent a few thousand on this experiment, and the ongoing cost is a few hundred per year.   So, the only major expense is distribution, some of which I could do myself, some of which simply isn’t possible for anyone to do without the service, but regardless, the cost would be about the same.  Have I earned the few hundred back in sales royalties yet?  Not even close, but I'm not giving up.  Is it sad or embarrassing to admit this?  Maybe a little, but I've only been at it for three years.

Now, where I fall short is the advertising.  We all know major record labels spend millions breaking new artists, and those artists often end up broke.  The music is out there, available for purchase in all the right places, but getting people to discover it is a challenge.  Heck, getting people to discover this blog is hard enough!  This is the part that could use additional investment (barring a lightning strike and an accidentally viral youtube video).

It’s probably strange enough that one person could self-educate enough to pull off all these different aspects of the music business on their own, but it’s odd to then also feel comfortable about self-promotion. There’s a side to me that is a behind-the-scenes guy, and by nature, my personality is such that I’m almost embarrassed about people hearing the music I create.  Yet on the other side is a person who wants his music to be heard.  Gigging out / touring would no doubt help – if I could get the work – but as of yet that’s not something I’m willing to attempt as part of this grand experiment.  I should mention that I love to write songs most of all, and would love to have them recorded and released by popular artists signed to major labels or placed in film soundtracks.  The pitching of the songs themselves is a separate DIY thing from being an online-only recording artist, and something to be covered in more detail in a similar, but separate article someday.

What none of this takes into account is recording artist publicity.  Paying for a publicist or a music PR specialist is something I’ve considered as a logical next step.  Why should I do it?  Without a marketing plan and real promotion beyond the free online services, I may continue to be dead in the water.  Someone has been buying my music – I suspect Facebook friends mostly, but I’m not even close to recouping my investment yet.  Luckily, that investment has been a small, affordable one.  The more specific question here is obviously how to actually turn a profit.  The desire to have the music heard and appreciated is ever-present, and I'm slowly but surely learning to identify and undertake tasks to make it happen.

I've heard it said that no one can be good at everything in the music business, and although I'm gaining noticeable knowledge and skill as free time allows, it might be time to increase the budget for and start taking more action in enlisting the services of someone who is a professional in music marketing.  I'm always on the lookout for ways to gain a larger audience, and aside from my own time for labor, would love to hear about more free online marketing methods.  Until I decide to pull the trigger and shell out for for pro music promotion services, I hereby welcome the advice or sharing of similar experiments from anyone else out there that I might take into consideration as I plan my next steps.  In the meantime, I’ll keep doing what I’m doing.  I’m planning another album release next year, and will continue to keep you posted on my progress from time to time, whoever you are.